<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Brooks on Neural Buddhism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/</link>
	<description>Religion and philosophy, in no particular order</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: arbitrarymarks.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who&#8217;s Afraid of Reductionism?</title>
		<link>http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/#comment-14473</link>
		<dc:creator>arbitrarymarks.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who&#8217;s Afraid of Reductionism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/#comment-14473</guid>
		<description>[...] though I earlier suggested that David Brooks was mashing together all kinds of ideas in his editorial, I do contend that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] though I earlier suggested that David Brooks was mashing together all kinds of ideas in his editorial, I do contend that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/#comment-14262</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrarymarks.com/wordpress/2008/05/14/david-brooks-on-neural-buddhism/#comment-14262</guid>
		<description>Also, via Pharyngula, I found &lt;a href="http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php?p=293" rel="nofollow"&gt;this discussion&lt;/a&gt; of the article. It has a lot better critical analysis than mine in terms of how badly Brooks misconstrues the finding of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, via Pharyngula, I found <a href="http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php?p=293" rel="nofollow">this discussion</a> of the article. It has a lot better critical analysis than mine in terms of how badly Brooks misconstrues the finding of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
